Since the subject matter very well cannot be explained so easily here in a blog, let us instead discuss why I decided to name it Sophie at the end in the stead of the conventional spelling, if you arent awarre yet of the fifth wave of feminism, start to catch my drift, it is not a choice anymore to be a feminist or not, it is a matter of equity and consciousness that lie on the male gender for all they have put women through over so many generations, two millenia, to be minimumly precise with you. Therefore, it is sophie's choice what she decides or wants to, and once that has been cleared it is simply a matter of meritocratic value that anyone would hold in a free and fair environment. That EthoZ needs to be created first however.
A concept of explaining something in a way that you have contextualised the dataset for them already so the management of larger data sets becomes stated through the "understading" of the concept.
These questions, or keyterms sotospeak have allowed for numerous progressed discussions rather efficiently and efficaciously by virtue of them being questions even when they are not necessarily so. Therefore in order to further progress we would need demarcations. There must not be any jumpscares due to the functions and operations of the jusxtapositional element of all question in (sub)sets to each other and to other correlatives and factors when equated, proprietered, inversed and proportionalised, and how that affects what is at stake, when and why, where you findyourself (a way to invent your own personalisation in life) afterwards, and why that must be a brighter place to be in than dim lights of the colonised chemical structures within Kemistree as e-kemichally digitalised and legitimised in society.
Comments
Post a Comment