Understanding Sentientialism

 There is more to the idea than meets the eye initially, it is not merely about recognising and acknowledging the status quo facto data present at hand, that each human is a sentient of their own, that is infact the bare minimum to operate within these spheres of constructs that are created when that knowledge is communicated, in varied means through diverse metrics and SI Units to be used for adjudging their contribution to the larger purpose of human compatability. For instance, let us assume there to be two genders and a non-binary gender that refuses to confine or define themselves by either of the two available constructs upon their (manufactured at times) free will, then it is our prime responsibility to keep the will of the humans in mind rather than the social conventions we have been taught to adhere to throughout our lives be as it may. This would adversely affect all existentialism-based philosophies for it renders existence as yet another construct to be identified and then communicably played with, and nothing more, therefore, the idea must be sufficed in its own self, without needing any external validation, for so is the credence of the philosophy of sentientialism.